首页> 外文OA文献 >Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels
【2h】

Accuracy of definitive casts using 4 implant-level impression techniques in a scenario of multi-implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival alignment levels

机译:在具有不同种植体角度和龈下对准水平的多种植体系统中,使用4种种植体级压印技术确定铸件的准确性

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of various implant-level impression techniques on the accuracy of definitive casts for a multiple internal connection implant system with different implant angulations and subgingival depths.\udMATERIAL AND METHODS: Six tapered Screw-Vent implants were placed in a reference model with different angles (0, 15, and 30 degrees) and subgingival positions (0, 1, and 3 mm). Twenty medium-consistency polyether impressions of this model were made with 4 techniques (n = 5 per group): (1) indirect technique, (2) unsplinted direct technique, (3) acrylic resin-splinted direct technique, and (4) metal-splinted direct technique. Impressions were poured with type IV dental stone. The interimplant distances were measured for casts using a coordinate measuring machine and the deviations compared with the reference model were calculated. Data were analyzed using intraclass correlation coefficient, ANOVA and Bonferroni test (α = 0.05).\udRESULTS: Four impression procedures showed significant differences (P = 0.0001). Only group 4 casts showed no significant differences in comparison with the reference model (P = 0.666) (ANOVA repeated measures).\udCONCLUSIONS: The impression procedure affected the accuracy of definitive casts. The metal-splinted direct technique produced the most accurate casts, followed by acrylic resin-splinted direct, indirect, and unsplinted direct techniques.
机译:目的:为了评估不同种植体压印技术对具有不同种植体角度和龈下深度的多内部连接种植体系统确定型铸件的准确性的影响。\材料与方法:将六枚锥形螺旋通气种植体放置在参考中具有不同角度(0、15和30度)和龈下位置(0、1和3 mm)的模型。使用4种技术(每组n = 5)制作了20个中等浓度的聚醚印模:(1)间接技术;(2)无夹板直接技术;(3)丙烯酸树脂夹板直接技术;(4)金属夹板直接技术。用IV型牙结​​石浇注印象。使用坐标测量机测量铸件的种植体间距离,并计算与参考模型相比的偏差。使用组内相关系数,ANOVA和Bonferroni检验(α= 0.05)分析数据。\结果:四种印模程序显示出显着差异(P = 0.0001)。与参考模型相比,只有第4组演员表没有显着差异(P = 0.666)(ANOVA重复测量)。\ ud结论:压印程序影响了最终演员表的准确性。金属夹板直接技术生产的铸件最精确,其次是丙烯酸树脂夹板直接,间接和非夹板直接技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号